Upper Providence Township

Robert Linn, Architect representing PIT, presented details of the proposed sidewalk his client would like to install along the frontage of the school=s property as well as a few residential properties to the north. The proposal is to locate the walkway outside of the right of way of Manchester Avenue, a Penn DOT roadway, so that the project could proceed without a review from the State, given the length of time such review usually takes. The goal behind the proposal is to make for a safer pedestrian walkway to accommodate both the students attending PIT arriving via the nearby bus stop & trolley line north of the site as well as the general public walking along the roadway. PIT=s attorney Donald Petrosa has prepared legal documents to be signed by his client and the owners of the residential properties within the scope of the plan. The agreements address PIT >s commitment to be responsible for the upkeep and maintenance of the total area of all sidewalks/walkways. The agreement would be subject to the approval of the Township. There are no changes proposed for the shoulder area of the roadway. After questioning and comments provided by the Planning Commission, Mr. Linn agreed to explore the possibility of adding to the project a pathway that would cross the area between the driveway entrance & exit points to create a walkway to be utilized by pedestrians who are passing the site and not entering into the school buildings. This proposed walkway may be of the same material as the proposed sidewalks or of another material acceptable to the Township. The Planning Commission encouraged PIT to maintain the trees out front & create a pathway that flows between them. While the Township recognizes that this project is not a matter of Sub-Division or Land Development requiring formal action by the Planning Commission, the Applicant will need to proceed under a Grading Permit. The comments of the Planning Commission shall be taken under consideration by the Applicant as construction details are developed, presented to and reviewed by the Township Engineer.

County of Delaware B 1521 N. Providence Road, the Rose Tree Tavern to be know as 1501 N. Providence Rd. , Preliminary/Final Land Development of the Rose Tree Tavern and it=s Carriage House accessory building.

Adam Matlowski, Esquire presented on behalf of his client the County of Delaware. With him were the project Engineer, Chris Fazio of Remington & Vernick Engineers and Architect Sandra Baggot of Baggot & Bak. This project had been before the Planning Commission as a Sketch Plan earlier this year. Mr. Matlowski shared with the Planning Commission the Order granted by the Zoning Hearing Board in July =07. The Carriage House is proposed as a secondary use to the activity already approved and taking place at the park. The Delaware County Conference & Visitors Bureau will be the occupants of the Tavern building and would like the proposed Carriage House to serve as ancillary use to the Tavern use.

Mr. Fazio addressed the August 22, 2007 Kelly & Close review letter. He stated that some of the comments had already been addressed and that they would comply with all the comments. Mr. Fazio went on to address the August 27, 2007 Memo from the Township Fire Marshal Alan Mancill. He stated that they had conversation with Mr. Mancill about his concerns and that the appropriate pavers could be added to the site to address those concerns.

Mr. Kelly spoke of the Waivers requested by the Applicant and stated that in his opinion it was acceptable for the Township to grant the Waivers.

The Planning Commission asked several clarifying questions addressing water & sewage capacity, sidewalk areas and landscaping. The Chair required Mr. Fazio to address the contents of the K&C letter point by point. Mr. Fazio did so after which those residents present were allowed to ask questions.

Public Comment :

Susan Harris, 101 Paxon Hollow Road B Questioned the orientation and design of the Carriage House. Ms. Baggot stated that the Pennsylvania Museum Board will review the building plan and her work was reflective of the requirements of the proposal since the Tavern is on the State=s Historic Registry.

Bob Johnson, son of owner of 160 E. Rose Tree Road B Clarified that Harrisburg would be the ones reviewing the proposed building design.

Sally Hitchcock, 81 Paxon Hollow Road B Commented on action of County to develop this site without feedback from the community.

(Female) Weisbond, 30 E. Rose Tree Road B Questioned style of pavers proposed.

Robert Vengen, 1551 Dog Kennel Road B Questioned the view of parking areas from the roadway and the landscaping of parking areas. Asked about the possibility of having parking areas graded into the landscape.

There was some spirited discussion between the residents and the Planning Commission members as to public notice, public interests and the duties and powers of the Planning Commission.

Doug Williamson, Council Liason suggested to those residents present that they come together with their neighbors and address their concerns to not only the applicant=s professionals but also their elected County officials as well as their local Council members.

The Planning Commission adjourned for a brief Executive Session and upon their return they requested the Applicant come back before them in September with a revised Final Plan. The Planning Commission stated several areas where they are looking for more detailed data.

Mr. Miller stated interest in clarification of items 2, 19, 24, 33 & 35 of the K&C letter.

He wants clearer delineation of trees to remain, and sidewalks along Rose Tree Road.

In lieu of sidewalks, perhaps a walkway similar to the one discussed for PIT where the path runs around the trees.

Mr. Dunn requested that proposed landscaping be added to the color elevation view shown so that the built-out view could be achieved.

Mr. Finan requested details of the storm water management and erosion & sedimentation plans be brought back.

The Applicant acknowledged the direction given by the Planning Commission and will submit revised data in time to be distributed for the September 25, 2007 meeting.

Act 537 Plan Update
Mr. Kelly made a brief presentation of the Act 537 Plan Update to the Planning Commission then after a period of discussion, the Planning Commission approved a Motion to Recommend Council Approve the Act 537 Plan Update. The Motion was made by Mr. Finan and seconded by Mr. Miller and carried unanimously. Mr. Solomon stated that he would like to encourage Council to include flash points regarding UPTSA=s future plans via all means of Township communications with residents.